Calling You a Sambo is Fair Game
Be that as it may, they have a right to their opinion, just as l have a right to critique their opinion for good, bad, indifferent – or woke, coon, or apolitical/innocently stupid but sometimes meaning well.
Be that as it may, they have a right to their opinion, just as l have a right to critique their opinion for good, bad, indifferent – or woke, coon, or apolitical/innocently stupid but sometimes meaning well.
Basically, if Michael Jordan, Oprah, Jay-Z, Beyonce, and any other rich Black celebrity are sellouts for not using their money to change Black America, then so are all of us for not using our collective dollars to buy Black first.
Here we go again with more conservative propaganda. This is what you call bastardizing an otherwise logical statement.
In previous blogs, I constantly called out the feigned idiocy and sometimes sincere idiocy of conservative pundits, both white, and knee-grow bootlicker as they naively weigh in on police brutality and so called Black-on-Black crime.
In the 1960 election’s first televised presidential debate, historians and news broadcasters described John F. Kennedy as looking smooth, handsome, cool, and well-put together. By contrast, they described Richard Nixon as looking disheveled, nervous, and uncomfortable.
These smooth-talking Democrats see they are losing the younger generation. They used psychological operations to troll and inspire us to get to the polls in 2020 and in an effort to keep us blindly voting for them.
Wow. Where do I even start? You have three types of people in relation to so-called Black-on-Black crime.
I’m pretty sure those mainstream conservative pundits are In the know of racist instigation of Black genocide even as they say “Look at them ghetto darkies killing each other.”
That’s a good question. Not really. It’s actually a dumb question. That’s a question you’ll hear conservatives ask.