They love to imply that Blacks are innately evil to thwart liberal critiques of police brutality on Blacks.
They know damn well they heard of the previously-mentioned instigators, as well as the reports that the CIA dealt crack cocaine to the Black neighborhoods in the mid 1980s to fund the Contra war in Nicaragua. Meanwhile, the Reagan and Bush administrations looked the other way. Black-on-Black crime reached its peak between 1985 and 1995. This corresponds with the explosion of crack cocaine in low percentage Black communities. Even with the media and CIA denying distributing crack in the hood, there has always been an abstract knowing of drugs and guns being delivered from elite outside forces.
So again I ask – what about White elite instigation of Black-on-Black-crime though?
White Instigation of Black-on-Black Crime
Of course, we know the Democratic party introduced welfare to poor Black families in the mid 1960s under the condition that the father kick rocks. This created a generation of destroyed Black families and fatherless Black boys. Add in the prior-mentioned destruction of Black empowerment organizations in the 1970s, crack cocaine being added to Black ghettos in the mid 1980s, and pop culture social engineering by rich, White- and Jewish-controlled music by way of replacing conscious rap with gangster and street rap, and you have White, elite instigating of Black-on-Black crime.
Once the Civil Rights Movement turned into civil unrest and riot-induced Black rage at White institutions and civilian-on-Black violence, and Blacks started fighting back through riots and self defense gangs-turned-self-empowerment organizations, the racist elites had to use sophisticated racism. Now, only institutions in the form of cops can sporadically assault Blacks, and institutional manipulated Black perpetrators assault their fellow Blacks. Crack cocaine distribution in Black neighborhoods and instigating rifts between Black organizations and gangs have taken the place of the prior White-on-Black lynchings of Jim Crow.
What about Spectators?
There are literal spectators and innocent bystanders who grow up around drugs, crime, and violence but never participated in the self-genocide. They might have been shot and robbed before by another Black person, or had a law-abiding relative murdered by way of this so called Black-on-Black genocide. A conservative snob could say, “look at those heathen darkies killing each other in that dirty ghetto.” The bystander could reasonably argue that he or she is not the one committing crimes and can’t help that they were born in the environment that your elite cronies created and fostered. They are free to blame the misguided perpetrators for falling for the trap of the manipulative instigators by killing and poisoning their fellow melanated beings. But they can just as well blame the instigating elite for throwing the no-look pass to the unsuspecting perpetrators each time they introspectively grieve and say RIP to their dead homie or relative.
A great deal of literal and nonliteral spectators and innocent bystanders criticize the misguided perpetrators harshly. And they certainly shouldn’t get a pass. I have zero respect for any brother I hear bragging and occasionally exaggerating their past street exploits; talking about “My name used to ring bells on XYZ ave.” FOH. Nobody remembers your nut asses. “I’m from the skreets.” Yeah ok. A case could be made for calling them coons, sellouts, and Sambos. They’re too dumb to see that they are pawns to the instigators. Every kingpin that you read about in Don Diva and FEDS magazine, and that you watch on BET American Gangster documentaries, are pawns not leaders. They are low level coons, I meant goons also, not bosses. The real bosses are the elite power structure who make street legends, wannabe street legends-turned street punks, and low-level broke dealers.
Conservative Instigators
Nonetheless, I’m hip to the broader game of the elite instigators’ defenders called the conservative pundits. Every time an unarmed Black man is shot, and Blacks and liberal pundits become outraged, those conservative pundits use several clever manipulative tactics to control the narrative and try to win the TV debate. The strawman argument is one, where they purposely misrepresent the outraged Black liberals’ argument and passionately argue against it. “You’re saying all cops are bad and should be attacked.” “You’re saying all Whites are racist.” “Black lives matter? So you’re saying White lives don’t matter?” That’s clearly not what your liberal opponent just said.
Then there is the diversionary tactic of “What about Black-on-Black crime though?” Then there is outright lying, by saying Blacks sit idly by as Black-on-Black crime occurs just waiting for a cop to shoot a Black man before they protest and feel concerned. As mentioned in the What about Black-on-Black crime blog, Blacks are fighting to bring unity and stop that small percentage of Black-on-Black violence as well.
And the last, but certainly not least, tactic is called playing possum and playing dumb. That’s when you make an argument of “What about Black-on-Black crime” while feigning ignorance to a reality, which is the valid and corresponding checkmate, argument and question of “What about the institutional instigation of Black-on-Black crime?” that I just documented here. I’m on to these clowns.
A Dirty Game
The game is dirty, y’all. Not the ghetto street game by perpetrators, but the corporate street game by instigators, as well as the conservative pigs who feign ignorance to this.
